This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessment model for the justification of intrusive lifestyle interventions: literature study, reasoning and empirical testing
© Wesseling et al. 2016
Received: 13 July 2015
Accepted: 10 February 2016
Published: 19 February 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Jul 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Aug 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Michiel Wesseling|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Aug 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Harald Schmidt|
|6 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lars Sandman|
|9 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Brown|
|31 Dec 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Michiel Wesseling|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Dec 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Michiel Wesseling|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|6 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|19 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12910-016-0097-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.