Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know - that is not the question

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201617:13

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0096-2

Received: 11 November 2015

Accepted: 4 February 2016

Published: 13 February 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Nov 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matjaz Zwitter
30 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Liliana Varesco
14 Jan 2016 Author responded Author comments - Bjørn Hofmann
Resubmission - Version 2
14 Jan 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Bjørn Hofmann
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
4 Feb 2016 Editorially accepted
13 Feb 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12910-016-0096-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Gjøvik, Norway
(2)
Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

Advertisement