This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Incidental findings of uncertain significance: To know or not to know - that is not the question
© Hofmann. 2016
Received: 11 November 2015
Accepted: 4 February 2016
Published: 13 February 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Nov 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matjaz Zwitter|
|30 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Liliana Varesco|
|14 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Bjørn Hofmann|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Bjørn Hofmann|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|13 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12910-016-0096-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.