This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention
© Rebers et al. 2016
Received: 14 October 2015
Accepted: 29 January 2016
Published: 6 February 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kjersti Fjørtoft|
|14 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jakob Elster|
|26 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Susanne Rebers|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Susanne Rebers|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jan 2016||Editorially accepted|
|6 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12910-016-0092-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.