This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Canadian research ethics board members’ attitudes toward benefits from clinical trials
© Cook et al. 2015
Received: 4 September 2015
Accepted: 26 November 2015
Published: 2 December 2015
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nathan Emmerich|
|30 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Resnik|
|30 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nancy Walton|
|22 Oct 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Kori Cook|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|22 Oct 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Nov 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Kori Cook|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Nov 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Nov 2015||Editorially accepted|
|2 Dec 2015||Article published||10.1186/s12910-015-0079-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.