This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Is it ethical to prevent secondary use of stored biological samples and data derived from consenting research participants? The case of Malawi
© Mungwira et al. 2015
Received: 17 June 2015
Accepted: 23 November 2015
Published: 2 December 2015
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Jun 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Aug 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Michael Parker|
|24 Aug 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tuija Takala|
|26 Aug 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gilberto Corbellini|
|5 Oct 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Francis Masiye|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Oct 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Oct 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Francis Masiye|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Oct 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Nov 2015||Editorially accepted|
|2 Dec 2015||Article published||10.1186/s12910-015-0077-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.