Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Ethics

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees

BMC Medical Ethics201516:78

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2

Received: 20 September 2015

Accepted: 12 November 2015

Published: 16 November 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Sep 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan Boote
20 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sabi Redwood
24 Oct 2015 Author responded Author comments - Felicity Goodyear-Smith
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Oct 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
12 Nov 2015 Editorially accepted
16 Nov 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of General Practice & Primary Health Care, University of Auckland
(2)
Centre for Primary Care Reform Research Excellence, School of Medicine, University of Queensland
(3)
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford

Advertisement