Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Patients’ reaction to the ethical conduct of radiographers and staff services as predictors of radiological experience satisfaction: a cross-sectional study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jul 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
Publishing
23 Sep 2015 Editorially accepted
8 Oct 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12910-015-0062-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement