Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Conceptions of decision-making capacity in psychiatry: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists

  • Manne Sjöstrand1, 2Email author,
  • Petter Karlsson2,
  • Lars Sandman3,
  • Gert Helgesson2,
  • Stefan Eriksson4 and
  • Niklas Juth2
BMC Medical Ethics201516:34

Received: 1 December 2014

Accepted: 29 April 2015

Published: 21 May 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
1 Dec 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Apr 2015 Editorially accepted
21 May 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12910-015-0026-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Academy for Care, Work Life and Welfare, University College of Borås, Borås, Sweden and National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden