Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

IRB practices and policies regarding the secondary research use of biospecimens

  • Aaron J Goldenberg1Email author,
  • Karen J Maschke2,
  • Steven Joffe3,
  • Jeffrey R Botkin4,
  • Erin Rothwell4,
  • Thomas H Murray2, 5,
  • Rebecca Anderson4,
  • Nicole Deming1,
  • Beth F Rosenthal1 and
  • Suzanne M Rivera1
BMC Medical Ethics201516:32

Received: 15 August 2014

Accepted: 23 April 2015

Published: 8 May 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
15 Aug 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Apr 2015 Editorially accepted
8 May 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12910-015-0020-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Bioethics, TA212 School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA
The Hastings Center and the Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Garrison, USA
Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA
Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore