Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Caring for quality of care: symbolic violence and the bureaucracies of audit

  • Nathan Emmerich1Email author,
  • Deborah Swinglehurst2,
  • Jo Maybin3,
  • Sophie Park4 and
  • Sally Quilligan5
BMC Medical Ethics201516:23

Received: 27 August 2014

Accepted: 16 February 2015

Published: 8 May 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
27 Aug 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Feb 2015 Editorially accepted
8 May 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12910-015-0006-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

School of Politics, International Studies and Philosophy, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary, University of London, London, UK
The King’s Fund, London, UK
Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL Medical School, London, UK
University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK