Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reconsidering ‘ethics’ and ‘quality’ in healthcare research: the case for an iterative ethical paradigm

  • Fiona A Stevenson1Email author,
  • William Gibson2,
  • Caroline Pelletier3,
  • Vasiliki Chrysikou1 and
  • Sophie Park1
BMC Medical Ethics201516:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0004-1

Received: 10 August 2014

Accepted: 11 February 2015

Published: 8 May 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Aug 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
11 Feb 2015 Editorially accepted
8 May 2015 Article published 10.1186/s12910-015-0004-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, UCL, London, UK
(2)
Department of Culture, Communication and Media, Institute of Education, London, UK
(3)
Department of Lifelong and Comparative Education, Institute of Education, London, UK

Advertisement