Smithline & Gerstle (1998) [29]
|
US
|
Interview survey
|
Emergency Dept pts
|
204
|
Patient had serious illness
|
Agree/disagree
|
| | | | |
1. Study intervention with minimal absolute risk
| |
| | | | |
2. Study intervention with greater than minimal absolute risk
| |
McClure et al (2003) [31]
|
US
|
Interview survey
|
Emergency Dept pts & visitors
|
530
|
1. Study intervention with minimal absolute risk
|
5-point Likert scale
|
| | | | |
2. Study intervention with greater than minimal absolute risk
| |
| | | | |
Two study scenarios:
| |
| | | | |
1. New therapies for serious bleeding
| |
| | | | |
2. Efficacy of public access to defibrillation
| |
Abboud et al (2006) [32]
|
US
|
Interview survey
|
Emergency Dept pts
|
207
|
Patient in cardiac arrest
| |
| | |
Geriatric Clinic pts
|
213
|
Two surgical procedures:
| |
| | | | |
1. Less invasive, intravenous line (minimal risk)
|
4-point Likert scale
|
| | | | |
2. More invasive, thoracotomy (>minimal risk)
| |
| | | | |
New experimental medicine in three study designs:
| |
| | | | |
1. Outside of a study protocol;
| |
| | | | |
2. Part of a study protocol;
| |
| | | | |
3. In a randomised controlled trial
| |
Goldstein et al (2007). [33]
|
US
|
Interview survey
|
Emergency Dept pts
|
473
|
Patient suffered cardiac arrest or stroke
|
Not stated
|
Triner et al (2007) [34]
|
US
|
Interview survey
|
Emergency Dept pts & visitors
|
497
|
General description of waiver of and exception from informed consent studies
|
5-point Likert scale
|
Booth et al (2005) [30]
|
UK
|
Self-completion questionnaire
|
Out-patients
|
362
|
Patient suffered heart attack, stroke or head injury
|
Yes/No/Don't know
|
| | | | |
1. Study intervention with minimal risk
| |
| | | | |
2. Study intervention with moderate risk
| |