This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Top 10 health care ethics challenges facing the public: views of Toronto bioethicists
© Breslin et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 25 December 2004
Accepted: 26 June 2005
Published: 26 June 2005
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Dec 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Feb 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karine Morin|
|16 Feb 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jaya Rao|
|25 Feb 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shoshanna Sofaer|
|15 Apr 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan Breslin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Apr 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Apr 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jaya Rao|
|2 May 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karine Morin|
|9 May 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Shoshanna Sofaer|
|19 May 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan Breslin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 May 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jun 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Jonathan Breslin|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Jun 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jun 2005||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jun 2005||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-6-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.