Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Top 10 health care ethics challenges facing the public: views of Toronto bioethicists

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
25 Dec 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Feb 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karine Morin
16 Feb 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jaya Rao
25 Feb 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shoshanna Sofaer
15 Apr 2005 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Breslin
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Apr 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Apr 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jaya Rao
2 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Karine Morin
9 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shoshanna Sofaer
19 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Breslin
Resubmission - Version 3
19 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jun 2005 Author responded Author comments - Jonathan Breslin
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jun 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Jun 2005 Editorially accepted
26 Jun 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-6-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement