Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Psychosocial determinants of physicians’ intention to practice euthanasia in palliative care

  • Mireille Lavoie3, 4Email author,
  • Gaston Godin3,
  • Lydi-Anne Vézina-Im3,
  • Danielle Blondeau3,
  • Isabelle Martineau5 and
  • Louis Roy6
BMC Medical Ethics201516:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-16-6

Received: 21 August 2014

Accepted: 12 January 2015

Published: 22 January 2015

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Aug 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
12 Jan 2015 Editorially accepted
22 Jan 2015 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-16-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Nursing, Laval University, Québec, Canada
(2)
Équipe de Recherche Michel-Sarrazin en Oncologie psychosociale et Soins palliatifs (ERMOS), Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Québec, Canada
(3)
Maison Michel-Sarrazin, Quebec, Canada
(4)
CHU de Québec – Hôpital Enfant-Jésus, Quebec, Canada

Advertisement