Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Are there morally relevant differences between hymen restoration and bloodless treatment for Jehovah’s Witnesses?

BMC Medical Ethics201415:89

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-89

Received: 16 September 2014

Accepted: 18 December 2014

Published: 23 December 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Sep 2014 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Sep 2014 Author responded Author comments - Niklas Juth
Resubmission - Version 2
17 Sep 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Oct 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Earp
10 Nov 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart Oultram
22 Nov 2014 Author responded Author comments - Niklas Juth
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Nov 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Nov 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Earp
25 Nov 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stuart Oultram
2 Dec 2014 Author responded Author comments - Niklas Juth
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Dec 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Dec 2014 Author responded Author comments - Niklas Juth
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Dec 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
18 Dec 2014 Editorially accepted
23 Dec 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-15-89

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, LIME, Sweden

Advertisement