Skip to main content

Table 4 Analysis of REC comments - non-industry (n = 122) vs industry-sponsored trials (n = 104)

From: Shortcomings of protocols of drug trials in relation to sponsorship as identified by Research Ethics Committees: analysis of comments raised during ethical review

Review criteria

Protocols with comments, n (%)

Relative risk (95% CI)*

P-value

1. Proportionality

61 (27.0)

  

Non-industry

34 (27.9)

0.95 (0.62-1.45)

.805

Industry

27 (26.0)

  

2. Minimisation of risks & burdens

26 (11.5)

  

Non-industry

15 (12.3)

0.92 (0.44-1.91)

.820

Industry

11 (10.6)

  

3. Privacy & confidentiality

63 (27.9)

  

Non-industry

29 (23.8)

0.93 (0.65-1.34)

.695

Industry

34 (32.7)

  

4. Patient safety

61 (27.0)

  

Non-industry

36 (29.5)

1.31 (0.84-2.04)

.228

Industry

25 (24.0)

  

5. Recruitment process

47 (20.8)

  

Non-industry

30 (24.6)

1.05 (0.63-1.73)

.866

Industry

17 (16.3)

  

6. Information sheet & consent form

182 (80.5)

  

Non-industry

100 (82.0)

1.04 (0.94-1.13)

.468

Industry

82 (78.8)

  

7. Subject selection

62 (27.4)

  

Non-industry

44 (36.1)

1.58 (1.01-2.47)

.045

Industry

18 (17.3)

  

8. Protection vulnerable subjects

9 (4.0)

  

Non-industry

6 (4.9)

1.53 (0.38-6.07)

.549

Industry

3 (2.9)

  

9. Methodology & statistical analysis

160 (70.8)

  

Non-industry

95 (77.9)

1.18 (1.01-1.37)

.038

Industry

65 (62.5)

  

10. Product information

65 (28.8)

  

Non-industry

38 (31.1)

1.16 (0.75-1.78)

.507

Industry

27 (26.0)

  

11. Supporting documentation

154 (68.1)

  

Non-industry

72 (59.0)

0.83 (0.72-0.95)

.006

Industry

82 (78.8)

  

12. Facilities & research staff

57 (25.2)

  

Non-industry

39 (32.0)

1.60 (0.98-2.60)

.060

Industry

18 (17.3)

  

13. Financial aspects

39 (17.3)

  

Non-industry

25 (20.5)

1.65 (0.90-3.01)

.103

Industry

14 (13.5)

  
  1. * Relative risks are controlled for the REC that reviewed the protocol.