Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Contemporary issues concerning informed consent in Japan based on a review of court decisions and characteristics of Japanese culture

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Jul 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida
25 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - clare delany
3 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Aulisio
18 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sakiko Masaki
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sakiko Masaki
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - clare delany
12 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Aulisio
23 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Sakiko Masaki
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
6 Jan 2014 Editorially accepted
4 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-15-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement