This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of ethical judgments exhibited by clients and ethics consultants in Japan
© Nagao et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 8 June 2013
Accepted: 26 February 2014
Published: 4 March 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|8 Jun 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|28 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tsuen-Chiuan Tsai|
|6 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rouven Christian Porz|
|22 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stella Reiter-Theil|
|26 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bert Molewijk|
|11 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Noriko Nagao|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tsuen-Chiuan Tsai|
|31 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Stella Reiter-Theil|
|6 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bert Molewijk|
|26 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Noriko Nagao|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|4 Mar 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-15-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.