This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Paternalism, autonomy and reciprocity: ethical perspectives in encounters with patients in psychiatric in-patient care
© Pelto-Piri et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 2 August 2012
Accepted: 26 November 2013
Published: 6 December 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Veikko Pelto-Piri|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonios Tzamaloukas|
|21 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - kevin reid|
|31 Jan 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Veikko Pelto-Piri|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|31 Jan 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - kevin reid|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Nov 2013||Editorially accepted|
|6 Dec 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-14-49|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.