Table 2 Prevalence of authors’ conflicts of interest according to specialty society
From: Underreporting of conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: cross sectional study
Name of society | Number of included guidelines | Number of authors | Number of authors with conflicts |
|---|---|---|---|
Danish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care | 1 | 7 | 1 (14%) |
Danish Society of Cardiology | 5 | 22 | 16 (73%) |
Danish Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry | 5 | 19 | 9 (47%) |
Danish Society of Dermatology | 1 | 3 | 3 (100%) |
Danish Society of Endocrinology | 1 | 6 | 6 (100%) |
Danish Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology | 5 | 29 | 9 (31%) |
Danish Society of Haematology | 2 | 17 | 11 (65%) |
Danish Society of Infectious Diseases | 1 | 5 | 4 (80%) |
Danish Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology | 5 | 13 | 6 (46%) |
Danish Society of Nephrology | 1 | 8 | 5 (63%) |
Danish Society of Neurology | 1 | 8 | 2 (25%) |
Danish Society of Paediatrics | 5 | 26 | 6 (23%) |
Danish Society of Respiratory Medicine | 5 | 18 | 11 (61%) |
Danish Society of Rheumatology | 2 | 17 | 13 (76%) |
Collaborative guidelines | 5 | 56 | 33 (59%) |