Can physicians’ judgments of futility be accepted by patients?: A comparative survey of Japanese physicians and laypeople
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Dec 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida|
|3 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Darryl Macer|
|9 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Yasuhiro Kadooka|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida|
|9 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Darryl Macer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|20 Apr 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-13-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.