Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Can physicians’ judgments of futility be accepted by patients?: A comparative survey of Japanese physicians and laypeople

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida
3 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Darryl Macer
9 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Yasuhiro Kadooka
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Feb 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida
9 Apr 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Darryl Macer
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
20 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
20 Apr 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-13-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement