This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Pharmaceutical information systems and possible implementations of informed consent - developing an heuristic
© Ploug and Holm; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 26 April 2012
Accepted: 17 October 2012
Published: 16 November 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Apr 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lars Ursin|
|20 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - clare delany|
|24 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Carter|
|4 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Ploug|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lars Ursin|
|11 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrian Carter|
|24 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - clare delany|
|17 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Ploug|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Ploug|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Oct 2012||Editorially accepted|
|16 Nov 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-13-30|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.