This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study
© Kiguba et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 9 April 2011
Accepted: 13 August 2012
Published: 21 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|24 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reidar Krummradt Lie|
|27 Apr 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henry Silverman|
|10 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Keymanthri Moodley|
|12 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Ronald Kiguba|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Jul 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henry Silverman|
|3 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Reidar Krummradt Lie|
|8 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Keymanthri Moodley|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Ronald Kiguba|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|16 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|25 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Henry Silverman|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|13 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|21 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-13-21|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.