Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Apr 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reidar Krummradt Lie
27 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henry Silverman
10 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keymanthri Moodley
12 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ronald Kiguba
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henry Silverman
3 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Reidar Krummradt Lie
8 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Keymanthri Moodley
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Ronald Kiguba
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
25 Sep 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Henry Silverman
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
13 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
21 Aug 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-13-21

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement