Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of descriptive characteristics of participants (n = 21)

From: Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees

Participant code

Gender

REC status

REC experience (years)

Ethics qualificationa

Expertise

REC1

Male

Chair

 > 15

Postgraduate Diploma

Clinical specialist

Regulatory affairs

Research ethics

REC2

Female

Chair

10–15

Masters

Health professional

Bioethics

REC3

Female

Member

10–15

Postgraduate Diploma

Professional care

Research ethics

REC4

Female

Chair

 > 15

Honours

Health professional

Qualitative methods

Applied ethics

REC5

Male

Chair

 > 15

–

Medical scientist

Quantitative methods

REC6

Female

Member

10–15

Postgraduate Diploma

Health professional

Research ethics

REC7

Female

Member

1–5

–

Laboratory scientist

REC8

Female

Member

 > 15

Doctorate

Bioethics

Social scientist

REC9

Male

Member

6–10

–

Clinical specialist

Clinician researcher

REC10

Female

Member

1–5

–

Health professional

REC11

Female

Member

10–15

–

Clinical specialist

Quantitative methods

REC12

Female

Member

10–15

–

Health professional

Qualitative methods

REC13

Female

Member

1–5

–

Clinical specialist

REC14

Male

Chair

6–10

Postgraduate Diploma

Laboratory scientist

Research ethics

REC15

Female

Chair

 > 15

Doctorate

Clinical specialist

Research ethics

Biostatistics

REC16

Female

Chair

 > 15

Postgraduate Diploma

Health professional

Research ethics

REC17

Male

Chair

 > 15

–

Professional care

REC18

Female

Chair

6–10

Postgraduate Diploma

Health professional

Research ethics

REC19

Female

Member

1–5

–

Social scientist

REC20

Female

Chair

10–15

–

Laboratory scientist

REC21

Female

Member

 > 15

Doctorate

Legally qualified

Research ethics

  1. adenotes formal ethics qualification. All participants had undergone research ethics training in the last three years