Are advance directives helpful for good end of life decision making: a cross sectional survey of health professionals
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 2 June 2016
Accepted: 15 May 2017
Published: 5 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James A. Anderson|
|11 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Jenkins|
|8 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Aurelija Blazeviciene|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James A. Anderson|
|31 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Jenkins|
|23 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Aurelija Blazeviciene|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Aurelija Blazeviciene|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|5 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0197-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.