Presumed consent: licenses and limits inferred from the case of geriatric hip fractures
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 28 June 2016
Accepted: 17 February 2017
Published: 24 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iain Moppett|
|1 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Mears|
|1 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Joseph Bernstein|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iain Moppett|
|3 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Joseph Bernstein|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|24 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12910-017-0180-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.