Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

“I passed the test!” Evidence of diagnostic misconception in the recruitment of population controls for an H3Africa genomic study in Cape Town, South Africa

BMC Medical EthicsBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201718:12

DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0175-z

Received: 13 October 2016

Accepted: 8 February 2017

Published: 15 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sarah Knerr
22 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dana Mahr
15 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Francis Masiye
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Francis Masiye
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
8 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
15 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12910-017-0175-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Faculty of Health Sciences
(2)
University of Malawi College of Medicine, School of Public Health, Centre for Bioethics in Eastern and Southern Africa (CEBESA)

Advertisement