What is presumed when we presume consent?
© Pierscionek; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 04 October 2007
Accepted: 25 April 2008
Published: 25 April 2008
Open Peer Review reports
|4 Oct 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|4 Oct 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Barbara Pierscionek|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Oct 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gill Haddow|
|21 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joan McGregor|
|29 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Taylor|
|28 Mar 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Barbara Pierscionek|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Mar 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|21 Apr 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gill Haddow|
|23 Apr 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Barbara Pierscionek|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|23 Apr 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Apr 2008||Editorially accepted|
|25 Apr 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-9-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.