Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

What is presumed when we presume consent?

BMC Medical Ethics20089:8

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-8

Received: 04 October 2007

Accepted: 25 April 2008

Published: 25 April 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
4 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - Barbara Pierscionek
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Oct 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gill Haddow
21 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan McGregor
29 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Taylor
28 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Barbara Pierscionek
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
21 Apr 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gill Haddow
23 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Barbara Pierscionek
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
25 Apr 2008 Editorially accepted
25 Apr 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-9-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster

Advertisement