How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review
© Coleman and Bouësseau; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 21 October 2007
Accepted: 28 March 2008
Published: 28 March 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Oct 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Soren Holm|
|22 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Colin Gavaghan|
|28 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jerry Menikoff|
|27 Feb 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Carl Coleman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Feb 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Mar 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Carl Coleman|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Mar 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 Mar 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Carl Coleman|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|28 Mar 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Mar 2008||Editorially accepted|
|28 Mar 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-9-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.