Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review

BMC Medical Ethics20089:6

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-9-6

Received: 21 October 2007

Accepted: 28 March 2008

Published: 28 March 2008

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
21 Oct 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Dec 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Soren Holm
22 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Colin Gavaghan
28 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jerry Menikoff
27 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Carl Coleman
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
27 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Carl Coleman
Resubmission - Version 4
27 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
28 Mar 2008 Author responded Author comments - Carl Coleman
Resubmission - Version 5
28 Mar 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Mar 2008 Editorially accepted
28 Mar 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-9-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Seton Hall Law School
(2)
Department of Ethics, Equity, Trade & Human Rights, World Health Organization

Advertisement