Evidence-based ethics – What it should be and what it shouldn't
© Strech; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 18 September 2008
Accepted: 20 October 2008
Published: 20 October 2008
Open Peer Review reports
|18 Sep 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Hunter|
|30 Sep 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Ashcroft|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Oct 2008||Editorially accepted|
|20 Oct 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-9-16|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.