Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Attitudes and behaviors of Japanese physicians concerning withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for end-of-life patients: results from an Internet survey

BMC Medical Ethics20078:7

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-7

Received: 07 February 2007

Accepted: 19 June 2007

Published: 19 June 2007

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
7 Feb 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida
27 Mar 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tore Nilstun
20 Apr 2007 Author responded Author comments - Seiji Bito
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Apr 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida
8 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tore Nilstun
22 May 2007 Author responded Author comments - Seiji Bito
Resubmission - Version 4
22 May 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
19 Jun 2007 Editorially accepted
19 Jun 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-8-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center
(2)
Kumamoto University

Advertisement