Attitudes and behaviors of Japanese physicians concerning withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for end-of-life patients: results from an Internet survey
© Bito and Asai; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 07 February 2007
Accepted: 19 June 2007
Published: 19 June 2007
Open Peer Review reports
|7 Feb 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida|
|27 Mar 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tore Nilstun|
|20 Apr 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Seiji Bito|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Apr 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida|
|8 May 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tore Nilstun|
|22 May 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Seiji Bito|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 May 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Jun 2007||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jun 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-8-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.