Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal

BMC Medical Ethics20078:2

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-2

Received: 25 August 2006

Accepted: 29 March 2007

Published: 29 March 2007

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
25 Aug 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - norman fost
23 Oct 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julian Savulescu
18 Jan 2007 Author responded Author comments - Bengt Kayser
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jan 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Feb 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - norman fost
21 Feb 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Julian Savulescu
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
22 Mar 2007 Author responded Author comments - Bengt Kayser
Resubmission - Version 5
22 Mar 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
29 Mar 2007 Editorially accepted
29 Mar 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-8-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Professor, Institute of movement sciences and sports medicine, Faculty of medicine, University of Geneva
(2)
Professor, Institute of biomedical ethics, Faculty of medicine, University of Geneva
(3)
Reader, University of Paisley

Advertisement