Current anti-doping policy: a critical appraisal
© Kayser et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 25 August 2006
Accepted: 29 March 2007
Published: 29 March 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Aug 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - norman fost|
|23 Oct 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julian Savulescu|
|18 Jan 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Bengt Kayser|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Jan 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - norman fost|
|21 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julian Savulescu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Mar 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Bengt Kayser|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Mar 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|29 Mar 2007||Editorially accepted|
|29 Mar 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-8-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.