Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Experts' attitudes towards medical futility: an empirical survey from Japan

BMC Medical Ethics20067:8

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-7-8

Received: 08 May 2006

Accepted: 10 June 2006

Published: 10 June 2006

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
8 May 2006 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida
23 May 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tore Nilstun
1 Jun 2006 Author responded Author comments - Alireza Bagheri
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Jun 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida
5 Jun 2006 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tore Nilstun
9 Jun 2006 Author responded Author comments - Alireza Bagheri
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jun 2006 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
10 Jun 2006 Editorially accepted
10 Jun 2006 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-7-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Graduate School of Law, Kyoto University
(2)
Department of Bioethics, Faculty of Medical and Pharmaceutical Science, Kumamoto University

Advertisement