Experts' attitudes towards medical futility: an empirical survey from Japan
© Bagheri et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 08 May 2006
Accepted: 10 June 2006
Published: 10 June 2006
Open Peer Review reports
|8 May 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 May 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida|
|23 May 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tore Nilstun|
|1 Jun 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Alireza Bagheri|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Jun 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Jun 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Noritoshi Tanida|
|5 Jun 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tore Nilstun|
|9 Jun 2006||Author responded||Author comments - Alireza Bagheri|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Jun 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|10 Jun 2006||Editorially accepted|
|10 Jun 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-7-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.