On pandemics and the duty to care: whose duty? who cares?
© Ruderman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
Received: 04 January 2006
Accepted: 20 April 2006
Published: 20 April 2006
Open Peer Review reports
|4 Jan 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Jan 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Wynia|
|27 Feb 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Evan DeRenzo|
|9 Mar 2006||Author responded||Author comments - C. Shawn Tracy|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Mar 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Mar 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Wynia|
|28 Mar 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Evan DeRenzo|
|13 Apr 2006||Author responded||Author comments - C. Shawn Tracy|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Apr 2006||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Apr 2006||Editorially accepted|
|20 Apr 2006||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-7-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.