Death, dying and informatics: misrepresenting religion on MedLine
© del Pozo and Fins; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 16 March 2005
Accepted: 01 July 2005
Published: 01 July 2005
Open Peer Review reports
|16 Mar 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 May 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Camilla Zimmermann|
|14 May 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Solomon (Solly) Benatar|
|6 Jun 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Pablo Rodriguez del Pozo|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|6 Jun 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Jun 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Camilla Zimmermann|
|29 Jun 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Pablo Rodriguez del Pozo|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|29 Jun 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Jul 2005||Editorially accepted|
|1 Jul 2005||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-6-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.