Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Death, dying and informatics: misrepresenting religion on MedLine

BMC Medical Ethics20056:6

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-6-6

Received: 16 March 2005

Accepted: 01 July 2005

Published: 01 July 2005

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
16 Mar 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Camilla Zimmermann
14 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Solomon (Solly) Benatar
6 Jun 2005 Author responded Author comments - Pablo Rodriguez del Pozo
Resubmission - Version 3
6 Jun 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jun 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Camilla Zimmermann
29 Jun 2005 Author responded Author comments - Pablo Rodriguez del Pozo
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Jun 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
1 Jul 2005 Editorially accepted
1 Jul 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-6-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University in Qatar (WCMC-Q)
(2)
Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Medical College of Cornell University (WMCCU)

Advertisement