Status of national research bioethics committees in the WHO African region
© Kirigia et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 06 June 2005
Accepted: 20 October 2005
Published: 20 October 2005
Open Peer Review reports
|6 Jun 2005||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Aug 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Solomon (Solly) Benatar|
|15 Aug 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Morrow|
|28 Aug 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Joses Muthuri Kirigia|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Aug 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Oct 2005||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Morrow|
|7 Oct 2005||Author responded||Author comments - Joses Muthuri Kirigia|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|7 Oct 2005||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|20 Oct 2005||Editorially accepted|
|20 Oct 2005||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-6-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.