Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world
© Pattinson and Caulfield; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 12 October 2004
Accepted: 13 December 2004
Published: 13 December 2004
Open Peer Review reports
|12 Oct 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Oct 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernard Dickens|
|29 Oct 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Robertson|
|17 Nov 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Timothy Caulfield|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Nov 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Nov 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Robertson|
|3 Dec 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Timothy Caulfield|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Dec 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Dec 2004||Editorially accepted|
|13 Dec 2004||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-5-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.