Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Variations and voids: the regulation of human cloning around the world

BMC Medical Ethics20045:9

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-5-9

Received: 12 October 2004

Accepted: 13 December 2004

Published: 13 December 2004

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
12 Oct 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bernard Dickens
29 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Robertson
17 Nov 2004 Author responded Author comments - Timothy Caulfield
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Nov 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Nov 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Robertson
3 Dec 2004 Author responded Author comments - Timothy Caulfield
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Dec 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 Dec 2004 Editorially accepted
13 Dec 2004 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-5-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Sheffield Institute of Biotechnological Law and Ethics (SIBLE), University of Sheffield
(2)
Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta

Advertisement