Disclosure of cancer diagnosis and prognosis: a survey of the general public's attitudes toward doctors and family holding discretionary powers
© Miyata et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004
Received: 17 June 2004
Accepted: 01 December 2004
Published: 01 December 2004
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|17 Jun 2004||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Jul 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gertraud Maskarinec|
|26 Jul 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonella Surbone|
|21 Oct 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Hiroaki Miyata|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Oct 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Nov 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Hiroaki Miyata|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Nov 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Nov 2004||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gertraud Maskarinec|
|26 Nov 2004||Author responded||Author comments - Hiroaki Miyata|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|26 Nov 2004||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Dec 2004||Editorially accepted|
|1 Dec 2004||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-5-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.