American physicians and dual loyalty obligations in the "war on terror"
© Singh; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 18 May 2003
Accepted: 01 August 2003
Published: 01 August 2003
Open Peer Review reports
|18 May 2003||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 May 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - derek summerfield|
|30 Jun 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andreas Georg Schapowal|
|3 Jul 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leonard Rubenstein|
|7 Jul 2003||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - HU Baer|
|16 Jul 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Jerome Singh|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Jul 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jul 2003||Author responded||Author comments - Jerome Singh|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|25 Jul 2003||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 Aug 2003||Editorially accepted|
|1 Aug 2003||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-4-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.