Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

American physicians and dual loyalty obligations in the "war on terror"

BMC Medical Ethics20034:4

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-4-4

Received: 18 May 2003

Accepted: 01 August 2003

Published: 01 August 2003

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 May 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 May 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - derek summerfield
30 Jun 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Georg Schapowal
3 Jul 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leonard Rubenstein
7 Jul 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - HU Baer
16 Jul 2003 Author responded Author comments - Jerome Singh
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jul 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Jul 2003 Author responded Author comments - Jerome Singh
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Jul 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
1 Aug 2003 Editorially accepted
1 Aug 2003 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-4-4

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Howard College School of Law, King George V Ave, University of Natal
(2)
University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics

Advertisement