Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Human cloning laws, human dignity and the poverty of the policy making dialogue

BMC Medical Ethics20034:3

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-4-3

Received: 24 April 2003

Accepted: 29 July 2003

Published: 29 July 2003

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
24 Apr 2003 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Apr 2003 Author responded Author comments - Timothy Caulfield
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Apr 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 May 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daryl Pullman
19 May 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arthur Schafer
4 Jul 2003 Author responded Author comments - Timothy Caulfield
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jul 2003 Submitted Manuscript version 4
29 Jul 2003 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daryl Pullman
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
29 Jul 2003 Editorially accepted
29 Jul 2003 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-4-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Law, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta
(2)
Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta
(3)
Health Law Institute 4th Floor, Law Centre University of Alberta Edmonton

Advertisement