DNA databanks and consent: A suggested policy option involving an authorization model
© Caulfield et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2003
Received: 15 October 2002
Accepted: 3 January 2003
Published: 3 January 2003
Open Peer Review reports
|15 Oct 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Oct 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Sharp|
|4 Nov 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erin Williams|
|15 Nov 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Ross Upshur|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Nov 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Dec 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Ross Upshur|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Dec 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|3 Jan 2003||Editorially accepted|
|3 Jan 2003||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-4-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.