Consensus guidelines on analgesia and sedation in dying intensive care unit patients
© Hawryluck et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2002
Received: 15 April 2002
Accepted: 12 August 2002
Published: 12 August 2002
Open Peer Review reports
|15 Apr 2002||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 May 2002||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Li|
|8 Aug 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Singer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Aug 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Aug 2002||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Singer|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Aug 2002||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Aug 2002||Editorially accepted|
|12 Aug 2002||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-3-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.