Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Consensus guidelines on analgesia and sedation in dying intensive care unit patients

  • Laura A Hawryluck1, 2Email author,
  • William RC Harvey3,
  • Louise Lemieux-Charles4 and
  • Peter A Singer2, 3, 5
BMC Medical Ethics20023:3

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-3-3

Received: 15 April 2002

Accepted: 12 August 2002

Published: 12 August 2002

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting .

Original Submission
15 Apr 2002 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 May 2002 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Li
8 Aug 2002 Author responded Author comments - Peter Singer
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Aug 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Aug 2002 Author responded Author comments - Peter Singer
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Aug 2002 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Aug 2002 Editorially accepted
12 Aug 2002 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-3-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Ian Anderson Continuing Education Program In End of Life Care
(2)
University of Health Network, University of Toronto
(3)
University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics
(4)
Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto
(5)
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto

Advertisement