Self-reported attitudes and behaviours of medical students in Pakistan regarding academic misconduct: a cross-sectional study
© Ghias et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 25 March 2013
Accepted: 21 May 2014
Published: 29 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ioannis Dimoliatis|
|24 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bjorn Hofmann|
|27 Jul 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Svensson|
|23 Sep 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kulsoom Ghias|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Sep 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elisabeth Svensson|
|17 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ioannis Dimoliatis|
|15 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Kulsoom Ghias|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ioannis Dimoliatis|
|21 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Kulsoom Ghias|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|21 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|14 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ioannis Dimoliatis|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|21 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|29 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-15-43|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.