Generating genius: how an Alzheimer’s drug became considered a ‘cognitive enhancer’ for healthy individuals
© Wade et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 19 December 2012
Accepted: 3 February 2014
Published: 12 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Simon Outram|
|5 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joshua Balsters|
|11 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sabine Pompeia|
|13 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ralf Jox|
|13 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nadja Schroder|
|12 Apr 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Eric Racine|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Apr 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sabine Pompeia|
|30 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Nadja Schroder|
|30 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Eric Racine|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|30 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|3 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|12 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-15-37|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.