A mixed-methods study on perceptions towards use of Rapid Ethical Assessment to improve informed consent processes for health research in a low-income setting
© Addissie et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 23 August 2013
Accepted: 24 April 2014
Published: 2 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
|23 Aug 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sisira Siribaddana|
|17 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sassy Molyneux|
|13 Feb 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Adamu Addissie|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Feb 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sassy Molyneux|
|21 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Adamu Addissie|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|2 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-15-35|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.