Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Conscientious objection to referrals for abortion: pragmatic solution or threat to women’s rights?

  • Eva M Kibsgaard Nordberg1,
  • Helge Skirbekk2, 3 and
  • Morten Magelssen1Email author
BMC Medical Ethics201415:15

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-15

Received: 8 October 2013

Accepted: 19 February 2014

Published: 26 February 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Oct 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ros Kane
19 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christina Zampas
7 Feb 2014 Author responded Author comments - Morten Magelssen
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Feb 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
19 Feb 2014 Editorially accepted
26 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6939-15-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo
(2)
Norwegian Advisory Unit for Learning and Mastery in Health, Oslo University Hospital
(3)
Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo

Advertisement