“Media, politics and science policy: MS and evidence from the CCSVI Trenches”
© Pullman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 19 September 2012
Accepted: 6 February 2013
Published: 12 February 2013
Open Peer Review reports
|19 Sep 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|24 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yara Fragoso|
|3 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kameshwar Prasad|
|21 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Daryl Pullman|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|30 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kameshwar Prasad|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Feb 2013||Editorially accepted|
|12 Feb 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-14-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.