Screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendations
© Sheehan and McGee; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 28 May 2012
Accepted: 27 December 2012
Published: 8 January 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 May 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonios Tzamaloukas|
|25 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Herber|
|11 Oct 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aisling Sheehan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Oct 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oliver Herber|
|23 Oct 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Antonios Tzamaloukas|
|5 Nov 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aisling Sheehan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|5 Nov 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Dec 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Aisling Sheehan|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Dec 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|27 Dec 2012||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jan 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-14-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.