Benefit sharing: an exploration on the contextual discourse of a changing concept
© Dauda and Dierickx; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 March 2013
Accepted: 9 September 2013
Published: 12 September 2013
Open Peer Review reports
|8 Mar 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jens Aagaard-Hansen|
|1 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Doris Schroeder|
|14 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Bege Dauda|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|19 Aug 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Bege Dauda|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|19 Aug 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|12 Sep 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-14-36|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.