Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials
© Nishimura et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 8 February 2013
Accepted: 13 June 2013
Published: 23 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
|8 Feb 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mia Bergenmar|
|12 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - jocelyne rachelle benatar|
|26 May 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer McCormick|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 May 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Jennifer McCormick|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|13 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|23 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6939-14-28|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.